Representation to Huon Valley Council — Filed Under Protest by the Living Estate
(Formerly: Council Rates – Public Notices, Contract Law Tasmania, Mercantile Law, Civil Law)

📜 Representation to Huon Valley Council — Filed Under Protest by the Living Estate

Published Representations on Behalf of the NAME — Now Under Review by the Living Estate

The following representations were formally submitted and published by the Tasmanian Planning Commission under the NAME (MR ALIN VASILE MURESAN):

These are public records and establish standing in the system’s own jurisdiction. The Commission has failed, however, to upload or acknowledge the Lien against Matthew Grimsey and the Notice of Default and Dishonour against Jason Browne — both of which were served via email and publicly posted. This constitutes administrative suppression and creates commercial liability.

Furthermore, as the Tasmanian Planning Commission operates under Treasury, and the Treasury has failed to respond to the public lien notices published in The Mercury on 15 March 2025, the office of John Ramsay, Executive Commissioner, is considered in administrative default under unrebutted commercial record. A Final Notice was issued on 10 July 2025, which includes a conditional warning of lien should remedy not be forthcoming by the close of 11 July 2025.

This is compounded by the fact that John Ramsay — in response to lawful correspondence — presumed that Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan was acting under an assumed name, despite clear declarations of living status, rebuttal of all presumptions, and public testimony affirming lawful standing.

This ongoing refusal to acknowledge the lawful estate and jurisdiction of the Living creates not only commercial dishonour, but spiritual peril.

Jun 20, 2025, 9:17 AM

Ramsay, John <John.Ramsay@planning.tas.gov.au>To: For and on behalf of Baron Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan <houseofmuresan@mailfence.com>

Dear Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan,

My apologies for not understanding your assumed name.

I write to conform my previous advice, that at all times your representation to the Huon Valley draft Local Provisions Schedule has been published on the Tasmanian Planning Commission website.

The Commission has no knowledge of any suggested broken public link. Nor as is asserted in an email subsequent to your email below, was the representation reinstated after notification.

Other matters contained in this and subsequent emails which have been copied to the Commission are not matters within the jurisdiction of the Commission.

Yours sincerely,

John Ramsay

Executive Commissioner

⚖️ Jurisdictional Presumption by Commissioner Ramsay — Denial of Living Title

“My apologies for not understanding your assumed name.”
— John Ramsay, Executive Commissioner, Tasmanian Planning Commission
(Email dated 20 June 2025)

This presumption reveals a serious administrative stance:
That Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan is merely an “assumed name,” rather than a lawful and spiritual declaration of living status.

Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan is not an alias, fiction, or legal instrument. It is the living name of the man — distinct from the corporate title “MR ALIN VASILE MURESAN.”
To reclassify this living identity as an "assumed name" is to erase standing and strip divine inheritance.
This presumption constitutes jurisdictional overreach, administrative dishonour, and refusal to recognise lawful rebuttal of presumption.
It reflects the ongoing denial by corporate entities of the Cestui Que Vie trust fraud and the Living Estate’s lawful withdrawal.

“He presumed authority — but he stood on fiction.
I walk in truth. And the truth shall make me free.”
— Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan

📜 Expansion of John Ramsay’s Presumption:

“My apologies for not understanding your assumed name.”
— John Ramsay, Executive Commissioner, Tasmanian Planning Commission
(Email dated 20 June 2025)

This statement reveals a grave administrative presumption — that Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan is merely an “assumed name”, rather than an affirmation of living status, standing, and jurisdiction.

Let it be declared for the record:

Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan is not an alias or assumed legal identity. It is the true, living title of the man created by God, distinguished entirely from the corporate fiction “MR ALIN VASILE MURESAN.”
To interpret the living name as an “assumed name” is to deny standing, erase spiritual identity, and enforce the legal fiction under commercial presumption.
This constitutes administrative dishonour, and reflects a refusal to acknowledge the formal rebuttal of the 12 Presumptions of Law, which were previously issued and remain unrebutted.
Such a position — especially when expressed by the Executive Commissioner — is not a passive misunderstanding but a willful act of jurisdictional overreach.

This presumption aligns with the broader corporate system’s agenda:

To reclassify the Living as legal fiction, thus claiming rights over their land, property, body, and offspring — by way of the NAME and Trust.

But let it be recorded once again:

🕊️ The NAME is not the man.
🕊️ The title is not the inheritance.
🕊️ The estate belongs to the Living.
🕊️ And no official, registry, or commissioner shall redefine a living man’s God-given title by fiat or policy.

🛑 Presumption by John Ramsay — Fiction Maintained, Truth Rejected

John Ramsay, Executive Commissioner of the Tasmanian Planning Commission, has once again acted in presumption — claiming that the living name Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan is an “assumed name.”

“He presumed authority — but he stood on fiction.
I walk in truth. And the truth shall make me free.”
— Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan

Let it be known:

The Living Man does not answer to fiction.
The NAME is not the man. The trust is not consent.
No man-made registry may override what has been sealed in Heaven.

📜 The Commission has:

Published representations made under protest and duress;
Ignored and failed to acknowledge the Lien against Matthew Grimsey; the Public Notice and Lien regarding Jason Browne (despite its publication); and the Lien and scrolls addressed directly to John Ramsay himself. While the Tasmanian Planning Commission did publish the representation and Castle Doctrine materials, they failed to recognise the standing of the living man — rejecting the foundational principle that “an Englishman’s home is his castle.” This failure was revealed in Ramsay’s own correspondence, now published on this page.
Refused to acknowledge the jurisdictional challenge and commercial standing raised by the living estate.

This administrative evasion now forms part of the Scroll of Dishonour and establishes commercial and spiritual liability.

“For we can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth.”
— 2 Corinthians 13:8

⚖️ Consequences now follow.
The scrolls will not be withdrawn. The record stands. The man stands.
The system — unless it repents — shall fall.