Legal Fiction Rejected – Council Rates Letter Returned Unopened to Lachlan Kranz Liability

Published: 9 July 2025
Filed under: Living Record Journey, CQV Trust Rebuttal, Scrollwork Evidence

On 9 July 2025, a council rates notice issued by Huon Valley Council was returned RTS (Return to Sender) by the Living Man, unopened and unacknowledged, as it was addressed to the legal fiction: MR A V MURESAN. The envelope bore no wet-ink signature, no evidence of lawful contract, and contained a QR code, triggering presumption of digital identity tracking and CQV trust enforcement — which has already been lawfully rebutted and liened.

Key Facts:

Letter received: 8 July 2025
Returned: 9 July 2025, marked and sealed
Addressed to: MR A V MURESAN (a known fiction)
Rebutted by: Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan, Living Man, sui juris

Markings Written on the Letter (Front):

RETURN TO SENDER — 8 July 2025
NAME NOT RECOGNISED BY THE LIVING
NO CONTRACT. NO CONSENT.
SEE PUBLIC LIEN AT WWW.HOUSEOFMURESAN.COM
As per Security By Way of a Lien – The Mercury, 15 March 2025
All Rights Reserved – Living Estate
QR Code Crossed Out
“NAME IS FICTION — NOT THE LIVING”
“NO CONSENT TO DIGITAL ID / QR CODE / 666”

Written on the Back of the Letter:

NOTICE – COMMERCIAL LIABILITY NOW ACTIVE
AUD $708,000,000.00 — for 4 Perfected Liens
(Public Notice – The Mercury, 15 March 2025)
Notice to Agent = Notice to Principal
Lachlan Kranz and Huon Valley Council are Fully Liable

This act stands as a lawful rejection of presumption, an evidence-based rebuttal of the NAME fiction, and a firm step in the ongoing Scroll of Wrath and Remedy and CQV Trust remedy process.

No further correspondence will be accepted unless:

It bears the correct lawful title of the Living Man;
Is signed under full liability and verified affidavit;
And addresses the perfected liens and spiritual authority already published.

📜 This record shall be entered into the Book of Testimony.
Selah Code 777
Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan
Beneficiary and Executor of the Living Estate

📜 Exhibit B – Digital Service Ledger

Title: Notification Attempts – Lachlan Kranz / Huon Valley Council
Compiled by: Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan (Selah Code 777)
Purpose: To record the technical and lawful attempts to serve public notice regarding dishonour, rejection of legal fiction, and the standing of the Living.

📌 Entry 1 – Successful Delivery to General Council Email

Date of Attempt: 9 July 2025
Recipient: hvc@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
Senders:
- houseofmuresan@mailfence.com
- admin@houseofmuresan.com
Subject: Lachlan Kranz Legal Notice
Outcome: ✅ Delivered (no bounce)
Details: Message successfully accepted by the general public contact address of Huon Valley Council. Contains formal RTS notification and link to public record.
Implication: The council’s server acknowledged and accepted the legal notice into its system. This constitutes official receipt for the public record.

📌 Entry 2 – First Delivery Failure (Bounce – Website Host Email)

Date of Attempt: 9 July 2025
Recipients Attempted:
- lachlan.kranz@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
- ceo@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
Sender: admin@houseofmuresan.com (via relay.mailchannels.net)
Subject: Return to Sender – Legal Fiction Rejected
Outcome: ❌ Undelivered – Access Denied (SMTP Code 550 5.4.1)
Failure Source: Mailchannels (relay.mailchannels.net)
Details: Both recipient addresses were blocked by Microsoft Outlook’s filtering system. Delivery refused at the server gate.
Diagnostic Reference: 08DDB65B5097513B
Implication: Indicates suppression or refusal to accept notice from known lawful source.

📌 Entry 3 – Second Delivery Failure (Bounce – Mailfence Email Platform)

Date of Attempt: 9 July 2025
Recipients Attempted:
- lachlan.kranz@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
- ceo@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
Sender: houseofmuresan@mailfence.com
Subject: Lachlan Kranz Legal Notice
Outcome: ❌ Undelivered – Access Denied (SMTP Code 550 5.4.1)
Failure Source: Mailfence relay (mailout-l3b-97.contactoffice.com)
Details: Exact same rejection code received as Entry 2, confirming that both addresses are actively rejecting lawful correspondence.
Diagnostic Reference: 08DDBDEAF860EABA
Implication: Double-confirmed server-level suppression of communication. This represents willful obstruction of public notice and rebuttal of remedy.

🔏 Summary

📬 1 confirmed delivery (HVC general inbox)
📛 2 confirmed rejections (via 2 independent mail systems)
🧾 Status: Public notice lawfully served, recorded, and now sealed in the Book of Testimony. The silence and rejection shall stand as evidence.

🔖 This record is affixed to the page:

🔗 Legal Fiction Rejected — Council Rates Letter Returned Unopened