Legal Fiction Rejected – Council Rates Letter Returned Unopened to Lachlan Kranz Liability

Published: 9 July 2025
Filed under: Living Record Journey, CQV Trust Rebuttal, Scrollwork Evidence

On 9 July 2025, a council rates notice issued by Huon Valley Council was returned RTS (Return to Sender) by the Living Man, unopened and unacknowledged, as it was addressed to the legal fiction: MR A V MURESAN. The envelope bore no wet-ink signature, no evidence of lawful contract, and contained a QR code, triggering presumption of digital identity tracking and CQV trust enforcement — which has already been lawfully rebutted and liened.

Key Facts:

  • Letter received: 8 July 2025
  • Returned: 9 July 2025, marked and sealed
  • Addressed to: MR A V MURESAN (a known fiction)
  • Rebutted by: Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan, Living Man, sui juris

Markings Written on the Letter (Front):

Written on the Back of the Letter:

NOTICE – COMMERCIAL LIABILITY NOW ACTIVE
AUD $708,000,000.00 — for 4 Perfected Liens
(Public Notice – The Mercury, 15 March 2025)
Notice to Agent = Notice to Principal
Lachlan Kranz and Huon Valley Council are Fully Liable

This act stands as a lawful rejection of presumption, an evidence-based rebuttal of the NAME fiction, and a firm step in the ongoing Scroll of Wrath and Remedy and CQV Trust remedy process.

No further correspondence will be accepted unless:

  • It bears the correct lawful title of the Living Man;
  • Is signed under full liability and verified affidavit;
  • And addresses the perfected liens and spiritual authority already published.

📜 This record shall be entered into the Book of Testimony.
Selah Code 777
Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan
Beneficiary and Executor of the Living Estate

📜 Exhibit B – Digital Service Ledger

Title: Notification Attempts – Lachlan Kranz / Huon Valley Council
Compiled by: Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan (Selah Code 777)
Purpose: To record the technical and lawful attempts to serve public notice regarding dishonour, rejection of legal fiction, and the standing of the Living.

📌 Entry 1 – Successful Delivery to General Council Email

  • Date of Attempt: 9 July 2025
  • Recipient: hvc@huonvalley.tas.gov.au
  • Senders:

  • Subject: Lachlan Kranz Legal Notice
  • Outcome: ✅ Delivered (no bounce)
  • Details: Message successfully accepted by the general public contact address of Huon Valley Council. Contains formal RTS notification and link to public record.
  • Implication: The council’s server acknowledged and accepted the legal notice into its system. This constitutes official receipt for the public record.

📌 Entry 2 – First Delivery Failure (Bounce – Website Host Email)

📌 Entry 3 – Second Delivery Failure (Bounce – Mailfence Email Platform)

  • Date of Attempt: 9 July 2025
  • Recipients Attempted:

  • Sender: houseofmuresan@mailfence.com
  • Subject: Lachlan Kranz Legal Notice
  • Outcome: ❌ Undelivered – Access Denied (SMTP Code 550 5.4.1)
  • Failure Source: Mailfence relay (mailout-l3b-97.contactoffice.com)
  • Details: Exact same rejection code received as Entry 2, confirming that both addresses are actively rejecting lawful correspondence.
  • Diagnostic Reference: 08DDBDEAF860EABA
  • Implication: Double-confirmed server-level suppression of communication. This represents willful obstruction of public notice and rebuttal of remedy.

🔏 Summary

  • 📬 1 confirmed delivery (HVC general inbox)
  • 📛 2 confirmed rejections (via 2 independent mail systems)
  • 🧾 Status: Public notice lawfully served, recorded, and now sealed in the Book of Testimony. The silence and rejection shall stand as evidence.

🔖 This record is affixed to the page:

🔗 Legal Fiction Rejected — Council Rates Letter Returned Unopened

🕊 This ledger is entered into the Book of Testimony.
🕊 Selah Code 777 — Alin-Vasile of the House of Muresan
🕊 All Rights Reserved